Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo is
better than Ferdinand Marcos.
A better what? Well, see
for yourself and decide.
As of 31 May 2006, here is
their score: Marcos – 34 journalists killed.
Arroyo - 42.
Since the People Power Revolution
restored democracy in 1986, 79 journalists have been killed. Of these, 42 have been killed since 2001, the year Arroyo assumed power. Compare this to the 34 journalists killed under the Marcos dictatorship and one cannot be blamed for thinking that democracy is very deadly, indeed.
Even more shocking is the
fact that Marcos was in power for twenty years while Arroyo has been President for a mere five years. You could say that she
has erased whatever head start Marcos may have had in their journalist “body count” contest, if I may use such
a term.
Sure, people die everyday.
In the Philippines especially, people get gunned down every single day for the slightest
of reasons. What makes these press killings special?
Well, for one, of the 79
cases, only one has been solved by the police. Another thing that is particularly galling is that the government considers a case “solved” when a suspect has been identified. By this perverted definition, the government claims to have solved around half of the
murders.
In truth, only one case has been solved.
Perhaps it is expecting too
much from the Philippine Police. After all, most of the suspects in the slayings are either their fellow policemen or their political masters.
In a sign that he is
giving up and abandoning his duty, Justice Secretary Raul Gonzales recommended that the journalists arm themselves to deter further murders. If this is not idiotic, I do not know what is. Common sense tells us that one would not have the
chance to fire back in an ambush, which was how the journalists were killed.
Again, this may be expecting
too much from the Philippine National Police and the Justice Secretary.
To demonstrate how deadly
democratic Philippines has become, consider this: According to the Reporters Without Borders Annual Report, Iraq, a country torn by war and strife, is the deadliest country for journalists in 2005 with 24 journalists killed. The
Philippines, ostensibly a free and democratic
nation, is second with seven murders.
Just seven, you say? Well,
that number is bigger than the number of journalists killed in Afghanistan
(2) and Colombia (1), strife-torn countries
both.
There can be no press freedom
if journalists exist in conditions of corruption, poverty or fear. So says the International Federation of Journalists.
Clearly, press freedom in
the Philippines – that self-proclaimed bastion of democracy and freedom
in Asia – is under grave threat. And if that threat were to engulf the press in flames,
history tells us that democracy will soon follow.